- 9
- 7
- 5
- 6
- 39
- 42
'Being Dalit on a dating app. Upper caste men only want to argue over reservation, EWS'
— ThePrintIndia (@ThePrintIndia) May 16, 2024
Manisha Mondal @manishamondal25 writes in #ThePrintPoVhttps://t.co/SfHGR4JNeM
In the article the whale complains that upper caste men talk about ending reservation (40-60% govt jobs guaranteed if you're lower caste for example) and reject her.
Bruh they're rejecting her because she's OBESE not because she's a dalit. No one mentions their caste on dating apps lol. Look at her-
Probably because they saw the rest of her pictures showing her full body on insta and blocked her lol.
If she wasn't obese they would have stuck around longer at least. Even dalit moids would have rejected her.
Wonder if there will also be reservation on dating apps? Pradhan Mantri Dating Arakshan Yojana
Something tells me it wasn't her birth jati which is responsible for the lack of interest of men
The time you spent writing this article would have been spent better going for a run
It's a very common tendency to blame, when you don't have game
Seethe from Dalitus Primus himself blaming muh casteism rather than her weight for her rejection:
https://twitter.com/ambedkariteIND/status/1792461142645940495
- 2
- 4
lol mad about this: https://madattheinternet.substack.com/p/online-censorships-institutional
- 17
- 17
TITLE. YES THAT MEANS READ THE TITLE. YOU KNOW THE THING THAT IS THE TITLE. YEAH THAT, READ IT YOU "EGYPTIAN" FRICK
- 9
- 6
@the_holy_one love sucking peepee
- WeihnachtenSalvador : We all browse obese feminist instagram profiles sometimes
- 33
- 37
- 19
- 62
I (M35) am married to (F34). I also have a friend (M36) who we'll call Mark, and he is soon-to-be-unmarried to his wife (F34).
The reason why Mark and his wife are divorcing is because (according to Mark) she has let herself go. He has said she has gained a lot of weight (I have noticed that, but like I didn't really care), she stopped going to the gym, starting smoking, cut off her hair due to not caring to take care of it anymore, etc. When I told my wife of this, she just made a face and said that it was "trashy" of him to leave his wife in what may be hard times in her life. I understand that, but like, my friend said that he had tried therapy for her, marriage counselling, and antidepressants (she was actually diagnosed depressed) but she didn't really seem to want to help herself.
Honestly, I can get behind that. But my wife's mood always shifts whenever I bring him up now, and doesn't like the fact that I'm helping him through the divorce (it's taking a toll on both of them equally imo).
Been a back and forth type thing for a while, and im coming to this sub to seek judgement on whether i am wrong or not here. AITA?
Your wife is probably worrying about what you're going to do if she "let herself go".
Then maybe she should avoid.....letting herself go..... -517
It's "for better or for worse, in sickness and in health"
Not, as you/Mark/OP seem to think, "until my peepee can't get hard around her anymore."
Well, in that scenario, the depressed person was male, so that's clearly different. /s
Unfortunately that how things work in this forum.
- 22
- 23
- 19
- 13
It's a mutually beneficial relationship.
Individuals provide society with productivity and the ability to fight. In return, society protects the individuals by pooling these resources together, which amplifies the benefits for everyone.
This is true of every system - capitalism, communism, socialism, etc. And also true for animal societies.
But when AGI happens, society no longer needs most individuals. Which means there is no incentive to take care of them.
Yup. When machines can do what the poors used to there's no reason to tolerate poors anymore.
This is only true if you measure value in terms of economic output.
Which most do. You also have value in terms of militarily output, but again I don't think poors (espically one getting fre gibs) are going to be in shape enough much less willing to serve.
I think that our values run deeper than that, even if so far we've used the wheel of productivity as a proxy for human flourishing. Now that the great decoupling has happened, it's time to rethink the appropriateness of the proxy and find a better human-centered system. Like switching from looking at GDP to things like Gini coefficients and other population well-being metrics. Once we can hook the AGI to these metrics, we can get to a post-scarcity world.
There's even less reason to tolerate the lower classes in a post scarcity world! You have literally no need for them and they fuck up your life by committing crimes and using up land!
Inb4: buh muh crime caused by poverty!
I don't think the AGI overlords will have the guts to wipe most of us out and living in an endless empty land by themselves without seeing or interacting with anyone They have eachother lmao.
You don't understand the contempt they have for the "useless eaters". All sorts of problems would be solved for them. Overfishing, pollution, crime, global warming etc. Earth would be a paradise for them.
Yup.
It's very interesting that these people in charge don't see how they would be the โuseless eatersโ in a dystopian scenario that involves any technological dark age.
Nobody cares if you are a big ceo in the wastelandโฆ.they'd rather have a plumber or mechanic any day in their group.
Oh my god Tv has brain rotted so many people. A world were CEO control AGI (and I'm assuming machines that the AGI can use to interact with the world at large) is one were the CEO rules like a king. He doesn't care what you think because you don't matter.
That's a very capitalist perspective. I think taking care of everyone shouldn't be predicated on what they can provide to society, but just because taking care of everyone is the right thing to do for empathetic reasons, and for the good of our species as a whole.
How is good for the species as a whole? Walk me thru this.
We need to move away from judging people's worth based on their productivity, or whatever nebulous "value" they offer to society.
Retarded.
Also, something most of the capital owning classes fail to realise when judging the worth of people, is that without resources the vast majority of people can't participate in the economy, and when the economy falters capital becomes meaningless. That is if no one is buying anything, because they don't have money, there's no profit and if there's no profit there's no investment, and if there's no investment capital ceases to be meaningful.
None of which matters in a world were you can order your robot army to go mine some gold for you.
It's not just productivity that makes the lower classes important.
It's that and being cannon fodder.
If there are fewer and fewer jobs available thanks to AGI (or whatever), then it is only logical to provide the lower classes with a universal income. Because otherwise the economy would collapse.
Or all the money would simply move to the upper classes.
well, if AGI does everything for us, and it's intelligent enough to understand human needs and psychology, don't forget to include "Therapy/counseling/economics" are also things it can handle for us. Humans don't have the will to give out UBI because AGI is doing everything for us? Well AGI might have the will to do it for us, even if the current elite class who controls society doesn't.
Lol no. No one is going to let their WMD level AI just decide to be a libtard.
Humans lose the ability to socialize and fend for themselves because AGI provides all our needs? seems like AGI needs to be taught to coax us to interact and socialize with other humans and rely on it minimally for social needs.
These people are mental children, endlessly looking for a new tit to suckle at.
Doesnt AGI require everyones input though? All that data... its not like a bunch of dorks are re-writing all hustory in a basement. Thats years and years and years of information - provided by the likes of you and me - that AI is using. In effect, it very much requires us, and is also owned by us. No?
No!
- 7
- 37
Seems like this post inspired more concerned citizens !nooticers to come out of the woodwork to share their findings about Portland. If this was one of you guys, thanks for doing the lord's work. Ill probably start making these kinda posts in certain Bay Area subreddits.
- 104
- 25
"We are all fundamentally good. Yes, there are some rogues and sinners, but the heart itself is good," says Pope Francis. https://t.co/MmLPBhWVU2 pic.twitter.com/7Be2GrKrdB
— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) May 19, 2024
Bro, has the Pope even met people?
Does the Pope not realize that what goodnees he sees was hard-fought-for by his own church, and only possible by the grace of Our Lord as mediated by the Holy Spirit?
Does he not know that this is the good news that the gospels are named after?
!christians discuss!