Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

I don't think people realize how valuable free press is. Both Travis and Taylor have likely earned hundreds of millions of dollars as a result of this relationship, solely from all of the attention they've received from this fake relationship. (23)

On point with the “free press” aspect. Not to mention subs like this that are solely focused on their relationship. (2)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

Dating Travis plays into her good girl image. Matty almost destroyed that in a month. Dating the star football player is just about as safe and wholesome as it gets. She gets to rehab her image and he gets to find ways out of football. It's the perfect win win of every power couple. And actually a new thing for Taylor. She's never quite been able to find a partner willing to leverage the relationship for brand building. It's a mutually beneficial thing, and I don't think it's incredibly serious. He seems like a lot of fun and she doesn't seem like she wants another 6 year relationship. Let them have fun. (3)

How do you know what they want out of this relationship. You act like you go out with Taylor and Travis weekly and catch up on their innermost feelings. (0)

Basedness: 🔥🔘🔘🔘🔘

She's dealing with Shamrock holdings (Roy E. Disney's family investment firm) and if that doesn't tell you something… idk what does. I honestly think her most recent album was a cry for help, and fans are too dumb and are too obsessed with her relationship status to see it. Her contract holders are laughing at her, if that's the case. (-1)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

This is a deeply sad and stupid thing full of parasocial nonsense. (3)

Angriness: 😡😡🔘🔘🔘

I'm sure your very worldly experience does. You're in the wrong channel, darling (0)

I see this is the people who hate the album and everything about Travis and American football. I'll keep that in mind. Reddit doesn't do it for me. Too much negative conversations. (2)

Angriness: 😡🔘🔘🔘🔘

On point with the “free press” aspect. Not to mention subs like this that are solely focused on their relationship. (2)

Someone's got to call their bullshit out because no one else is. (7)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/Unique_Midnight_6924

Score: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 2

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡🔘🔘

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

OG

That is all

A bear is definitely the right answer because it definitely won't r*pe you like a moid will, and tbh you're probably way more likely to get killed by the moid

!moidmoment which one would y'all rather be stuck with?

The Denvchad Nugchads let them have a lead to be sporting but it wasn't enough. It's over for calicels and Lebroncel traitorcels.

In 2021, Portland Antifa extremists Melissa Lewis and Grace Morgan thought they could get a cash windfall by suing me for $300,000. Why? Because I retweeted them, which they claimed was a copyright violation.

Humiliated, their lawyer withdrew the case after a few days when he… pic.twitter.com/jjTkLJK9Tp

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) April 22, 2024

In 2021, Portland Antifa extremists Melissa Lewis and Grace Morgan thought they could get a cash windfall by suing me for $300,000. Why? Because I retweeted them, which they claimed was a copyright violation.

Humiliated, their lawyer withdrew the case after a few days when he became aware of the facts (thank you @pnjaban, @RonColeman & @Liberty_Ctr). Since then, Melissa Lewis has descended into depression, committing petty violent crime, and selling herself on social media.

- 11 votes

- 82 votes

- 250 votes

She deleted the thot tweet, but here's her page https://twitter.com/MClaudioLewis/

!chuds !fellas !foidmoment

!bookworms Also bought some books on ebay to fill gaps that werent there

Only #utilitarians defend lab-grown meat.

Utilitarianism is not #Veganism
. pic.twitter.com/gtQ0asjnEl

— Ana Belén Cruz Ⓥ (@AnimalWithEthic) April 20, 2024

!g*mers need help

i really hope nobody actually thinks this is my finger

Dear How to Do It,

I'm a trans guy who started testosterone earlier this year. It's mostly been amazing—one of the best things I've ever done for my own well-being—but because bodies are gonna body, of course there's one weird side effect that's driving me nuts. Where most transmasc people get vaginal dryness from T, I've gone in the opposite direction: my body has suddenly decided to start squirting. Enthusiastically. Nearly every time I orgasm.

“Awesome!” you might think, but no. Squirting is fine and dandy for folks who are into it, but I'm not. As someone who's on the ace spectrum and still in the perpetually horny stage of T, I mainly want to get off to scratch an itch and move on with my day. This used to be easy—hand or vibrator down pants, boom, done! Now the process involves laundry and a shower. I can no longer jerk off to shut up my anxious little brain, roll over, and go to sleep.

Is there any way to STOP squirting or make getting off as a squirter less of A Process?

—Boy Juice Made Me Too Juicy

Dear Boy Juice Made Me Too Juicy,

There are a lot of anecdotal accounts on the internet of increased squirting as a result of transitioning. Some believe that this is the result of the testosterone-prompted swelling of the Skene's gland, which is involved in squirting. As your letter suggests, though many desire, even fetishize squirting, not everyone who does it is so enthusiastic. In a column that ran a few years ago, my partner in HTDI, Jessica Stoya, asked porn performer/educator Madison Young what she does to dam her loins in a moment where squirting is inconvenient or otherwise unwanted. She said that she switches things up when she feels the urge to squirt, which “allows me to reset but keeps me in a highly aroused state in which I can still build up to orgasm or just simply enjoy erotic stimulation, touch, and pleasure without climax.” According to Young, switching up could look like this, for example: “If I was using a vibe on my clitoris, I might turn it off and use my fingers or move the vibe to another area of my vulva.”

For some additional expert assistance answering your question, I reached out to Lola Jean, a s*x educator who has appeared in this column a few times over the years and whose recent workbook Baby Dom/me/mx Bootcamp: a no frills guide to making domination a career is due out in May. I thought Jean's response was fascinating, because despite being a world record holder for volume squirting, they expressed disdain for their vaunted talent. “If you could give me a pill to stop squirting, I'd gladly take it,” they wrote to me early on in our exchange on this topic. Jean then elaborated in a longer email that I'm printing in full, as it speaks to your issue with some practical advice, and even describes different kinds of squirters. Fascinating for sure, and I hope it's helpful. Good luck.

Lola Jean says:

As a fellow squirter, your pain resonates with me. Because you are squirting every time you reach a certain level of pleasure, it sounds like you are also a broad-response squirter, as opposed to a specific-response squirter who only squirts as a result of specific types of stimulation of movements. While I'm sure specific movements also get you to rain down, it sounds like everything else does, too. Like many who find themselves in the broad-response squirting category, I too wish I could take a pill to never squirt again. I've invested in products from an endless supply of puppy pads, six washable squirt blankets, and even a blow-up nuru pool to contain my unwanted fluids. All of that is work and excess and I truly don't know if squirting is worth it.

But society seems to be hellbent on labeling squirting as the greatest thing since sliced bread, which doesn't leave a whole lot of room for those of us who have mixed feelings or straight up don't like it. With that, I have some good news and bad news. Just like there is no one tried-and-true way to squirt (no matter what that one guy tells you), there is also not one tried-and-true way to stop the squirting for a broad-response squirter. However, there are a few things you can try to do that overwhelm or distract the body to a point that maybe you won't squirt, but none of them are fool proof by any means:

Have something penetrating you without movement. Basically whatever is penetrating you here needs to stay internal. The hope here is that the pelvic floor is not able to do its full movement and the penetrating object is somewhat blocking the point of exit. Yes, the danger here is that your force will push whatever is inside of you out, which is why it staying put is so important.

Find a sensation that overwhelms you. Maybe that's intense vibration, perhaps it's something in your back hole, or even both. Sometimes involving the back hole can take the body's focus off the front.

Ride the hormonal shifts until they find their stasis. You're basically playing with a new body right now, and one that will continue to change and shift. There is a chance it will continue to do so and maybe the squirting will level out. That's a big “if” as we can't predict the changes your body will go through.

And since these are all educated guesses for your body at best, the other route is to begin an acceptance that your body expresses itself in a way when you feel pleasure that straight up sucks sometimes, even most of the time. You can have your moments where you get your puppy pads, your washable squirt blankets, or a quickie in the shower, but you're also allowed to negotiate yourself out of masturbation because you just don't fricking feel like it today. This feels unfair, and it is. This is also why it's important to talk about all of the aspects of squirting and why life isn't so great under the waterfall.

I wish I could give you a better answer and more hope, but by opening the conversation, perhaps you or someone who reads this can suggest ways that they have been able to stop their squirt temporarily or for good.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/diff/?id=d5cf50dafc9dd5faa1e61e7021e3496ddf7fd61e

Hi everyone

I just want to rant a bit about misinformations I hear from “educational” and “intellectual” sectors in my country regarding agriculture and the Green Revolution.

For those of you who don't know, Brazil is s breadbasket, along with our neighbors Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay. Brazil alone produces enough food for over 1 billion people which has lead to a prosperous agro business in the country, speaking from a family background, my maternal grandma was a dairy farmer and she still keeps a small garden to plant veggies on her house. My late paternal grandpa was was a seed salesman and he owned a Silo at one point and my dad is an agronomist (though his company works with forestry). Most cities in the Southern Countryside are agricultural focused, similar to the American Midwest, the Centre-West region of Brazil is another breadbasket however their focus is on cattle (though soybean production increasing). The Agro is incredibly professionalized and Brazil has produces industrialized Agro derived products like Soybean oils, processed coffee and biofuels.

That being said it is no secret the Brazilian left loathes the Agricultural system, but what makes me particularly angry is how much they misinform or straight up lie about making use of “educational channels”.

For instance I've noticed on Youtube channels like Brasil Escola and other Youtube “Professors/Teachers” will rant about how the Green Revolution is bad because of Rural Exodus and the horror, PEOPLE MAKING MONEY OUT OF SELLING CROPS

The worst part is that these “teachers” make their videos to prepare High School Seniors for the ENEM tests (the ENEM is kind of like the American SAT). The ENEM itself is extremely politicized as you need to write an essay (redação) about a given subject. The subject changes every year. For instance the 2022 Redação Subject was “Challenges facing the traditional peoples of Brazil”, that is the indigenous and quilombolas. Last year the subject was “Challenges to face the invisibility of caretaking work made by women”. In 2019 it was “democratization of cinema access in Brazil”, and so on.

Scrolling down the comments of the Youtube Teachercels channels I keep finding the same nonsensical claim:

>FAMILY AGRICULTURE FEEDS 75% OF OUR POPULATION WE DON'T NEED AGRO

>GMOs ARE POISONOUS AND CAUSE CANCER

>LE EVIL MONSANTO

I always read this nonsense online when leftoids talk about the Agro Business. That number is false.

https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/agronegocio/agricultura-familiar-nao-precisa-da-falsa-propaganda-de-que-produz-70-dos-alimentos/

O censo agropecuário de 2017, o mais recente, também desmentiu os números superestimados da produção familiar, e revelou que as propriedades assim enquadradas respondiam por 23% do valor total da produção dos estabelecimentos agropecuários.

Leia mais em: https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/agronegocio/agricultura-familiar-nao-precisa-da-falsa-propaganda-de-que-produz-70-dos-alimentos/

Copyright © 2024, Gazeta do Povo. Todos os direitos reservados.

The real number is around 23%

I remember the commies at /r/brasil soying about the MST (Movimento dos sem Terra) or “Landless Movement” a leftist group dedicated to private property occupation. They talked about the MST as id they singlehandedly fed the entire country.

Now, without mentioning their claims are completely bollocks, it seems they would rather disrupt the entire AGRO and place it under new forests or subsistence farming. Excluding the fact this would kill dozens of millions abroad and starve hundreds of millions by disrupting food supplies, it would cause starvation in Brazil as even the demonized AGRO crops (soybeans, maize, wheat) and cattle go beyond export.

Quando se fala de soja, ela está presente em vários outros alimentos, no óleo, no suíno, no bovino, no peixe. Ela é base da ração para esse tipo de rebanho. Você não se alimenta de soja de uma maneira geral, mas indiretamente ela entra na alimentação. > Com o milho é a mesma coisa. O frango é um milho com asa: 73% do frango é milho”, diz o pesquisador da Embrapa.

Corn and soy are used to produce oils and they feed the livestock which is consumed by Brazilians and foreigners alike. Not to mention derivate products like noodles and processed stuff. There's also coffee and cotton, the first is present in almost every Brazilian Household, the latter is the source for clothing.

These São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro teachercels and their leftoid “students” have an extremely romantic, idealized vision of subsistence agriculture to the point of being close to Noble Savage myths. That being said, President Lula is a strange man on this regard.

Lula has close relationships with MST leaders and allowed for this anti agro propaganda to thrive inside our Educational System (it's not only Youtube channels, regular teachers and they commie unions are the same), however when it comes to actual policy he's all business as usual. He always nominates centre-right agriculture ministers from Agro dominated states, he has meetings with Agro producers and businessmen and promotes our exports to China while trying to secure Fertilizer imports from Russia (also a reason why Bolsonaro was friendly with Russians despite the Ukraine debacle). It could be argued he pays lip service to MSTcels.

Anyways, I think this one of the most damaging and dangerous types of virtue signaling and feel good politics, I hope they never get their way but right now is kind of worrying how much PR this sort of nonsensical callous misinformation campaign currently has.

!macacos !neolibs

!neolibs

update: the food bank bandit was fired https://t.co/RFLqvVGJb1 pic.twitter.com/CDdrfrmbqI

— pagliacci the hated 🌝 (@Slatzism) April 22, 2024

Other hits include:

PEEPEE INSIDE KITTY

TRANS RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS

Add a comment

SMASH BALL

Rutherford mode

NIGG (Once again not the actual word)

I WANNA FRICK A DOG

What a strange creature

First off, thank you to my insurance risk pool for paying for me to get high 2x a week 🤗

I am on Spravato 84mg twice a week for treatment resistant depression having failed 8 or 9 SSRIs/SNRIs, hospitalized 4x, attempted twice (once which was almost fatal…in the ICU for awhile). People throw around the terms “abuse” and “trauma” an awful lot but some things I have experienced I've never even told another soul (even my sister). Really glad my psychiatrist is gay bc I feel safe talking about some of the CSA with him. I had a therapist before who I swear got “excited” talking about it.

I had been relatively stable for around 5 years until I faced some work stress in the last 12 months. I guess a lot of my problems came roaring back and I fell into a deep depression. I did inpatient, partial hospitalization and intensive outpatient and it didn't really help that much tbh. I am currently on 2X the max dose of Prozac and it just makes me unable to c*m or cry. It wasn't helping with the anhedonia and my panic attacks were still happening around 1x a week. I was running out of options (hence the $10k service dog….)

Enter ketamine 😍

Spravato is the FDA approved version for depression. You sniff it 3x 5 minutes apart and then they leave u in a room to go on a psychedelic trip.

WELL

This shit is working. I have my fourth session today.

The first two times I k-holed and had out of body experiences (seeing myself from above) and saw life was beautiful again….theres so much life to live. It was a lot like doing shrooms. The effects wore off pretty quickly but I was grateful for any respite from the despair. The third time I didn't have a full trip or anything (was more like being pleasantly drunk) but the effects have stuck around. As I wrote on another post, I am reading for pleasure, I have hopes and plans for the future and I believe all my problems have solutions.

My hot psychiatrist said they don't do it much at Northwestern bc of the tolerance you can develop. That part kind of scares me but hopefully I'll be able to crawl out of this abyss first.

If you have treatment resistant depression, it's worth looking into. I know for the Blues it just required failing one SSRI. There is a copay assistance program so you shouldn't have to pay much if anything to get it as long as you have private commercial insurance.

>A housing advocacy group is slamming Denver's new Asylum Seekers Program as “insufficient” and “a slap in the face,” even staging a protest to voice their disapproval — as the city spends tens of millions of dollars on migrant aid and slashes its emergency services budget to stave off insolvency in the wake of the influx.

>The program will provide six months of free housing, food assistance, workforce training and more to the approximately 1,000 migrants currently in the city's shelter system as they await authorization to work, which due to federal asylum seeker law can take up to 180 days.

>Until now, migrants were allowed to stay in shelters between two and six weeks, but the new rules dictate that migrants arriving in the city after April 10 must vacate after 24-72 hours, after which they will be “provided a short-term stay at a congregate site along with assistance securing onward travel to another destination.”

>Advocacy group Housekeys Action Network Denver (HAND) decried the changes, telling local ABC affiliate KMGH-TV that the shift would overwhelm groups working to help migrants.

Migrant rentoid expresses his grievances

>Migrant Willy Bastidas said the policy would only exacerbate the homelessness crisis families are facing.

and makes his demands

>“The mayor doesn't represent us … He needs to listen to us and work with us to a better solution.”

Intermittent fasting, aka time-restricted eating, can help people lose weight—but the reason why may not be complicated hypotheses about changes from fasting metabolism or diurnal circadian rhythms. It may just be because restricting eating time means people eat fewer calories overall.

No shit Sherlock. As always the article is boring and I won't post any of it here. Let's go -hunting in the top comments.

I think people find the "calories in vs calories out" rhetoric reductive is because it implies a simplicity that doesn't fit many people's lived experiences. Not everyone will absorb the same amount of calories after eating the same sandwich, or store the same quantity of calories in adipose, and not everyone will expend the same amount of calories when they jog for a particular distance of length of time. A person's microbiota influences caloric absorption. Hormones, epigenetics and genetics also play a role in metabolism. At rest, not all bodies use energy at the same rate. If we deprive the body of calories, not all bodies scale back the same expenditures at the same rate to conserve energy. So yes, calories in vs calories out is true, but not all true statements are helpful statements.

Yes, and what this study proves is that while it's always as simple as “fewer calories means less weight”, how the “fewer calories” happens isn't always “just eat less”.

Often the “eat less move more” is used incorrectly because of course it's technically true but most people when discussing diet are trying to talk about a method to eat less, move more.

It's always frustrating when talking about a technique of how to do X, only to have a bunch of people yelling “just do X!”.

Just eat less.

Also "most people when discussing diet are trying to talk about a method to eat less, move more" is bullshit. Most people when discussing diets are looking for some magical food that will cause them to lose weight. No one on a diet discusses how they should move more.

As the arrticle says, this does seem obvious (esp since Ive tried it myself) but as a (non-nutrition) scientist it would have been exciting had they found something unexpected. Sigh. But good work regardless.

BTW while calories in/calories out is absolutely true it's not automatically obvious how many calories you get from eating X. The rating on the box comes from burning food in a calorimeter! Meanwhile your body can extract calories more easily from a small piece of doughnut than from a large, fibrous chunk of broccoli, even if they have the same number of calories on the label. To say otherwise is like saying, “well all chemistry is quantum mechanics” — completely true, but mainly in-useful.

Thanks for that, scientist.

I do time-restricted eating, but that's because I have acid reflux. Don't want tp be slamming a double cheeseburger, fries, and a coke 1/2 hour before bed.

Acid reflux is the only thing stopping this guy from slamming a double cheeseburger, fries, and a coke 1/2 hour before bed. I wonder why he has acid reflux?

So very much this. The whole “CICO”/“it's just physics!” crowd is infuriating.

Like, yes, of course the key to losing weight is to consume less than you burn. But that is by itself not a sufficiently useful strategy for addressing a population-wide obesity crisis.

Preaching sexual abstinence doesn't solve unwanted pregnancy, and preaching food abstinence doesn't solve obesity. You want people to overcome their most basic biological drives, they need more than a Nike slogan.

"Noo we have to account for the fact that everyone is incredibly dumb"

I tried the whole "eat a big breakfast so you won't need such a big lunch" thing. Doesn't work for me. I just wind up with three big meals a day instead of two, if I do that.

Happy birthday to the man who got 24 million Germans killed! Hitler also launched a world war that killed another 80 million people. Just because our rulers are evil does not mean Hitler was good! Fuck Adolf Hitler! https://t.co/JEYqQtxxBh

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) April 21, 2024

Hey Alex, who declared war on who? How many attempts at peace were rejected by Churchill? Why did Rudolf Hess fly on a solo mission of peace only to be locked away and tortured for 46 years?

The UK started WW2, though

and ukraine started the war against russia

He didn't sell out to the Jews like you.

Is your wife Jewish?

Are you owned by the Zionist ?

Did you fool around with Blair white ?!

(all the answers are yes)

Hitler is still alive. Except nowadays he goes by Joe Biden

>demonrats are the real nazis, libtard

BREAKING: Gavin Newsom just released a new ad saying Trump is going to order police stop women crossing state lines and force them to take pregnancy tests pic.twitter.com/3mZf6NVOqL

— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) April 22, 2024