Although one should always be skeptical and critical of what is posted on the 'farms, this accusation is so serious and, with far-reaching enough implications and consequences that I believe it is worth bringing forth before the users of this site. Today at 10:22 AM CEST time a user by the name of Coolio55 posted the following post on rDrama's community watch thread on Kiwifarms:

Turns out that that one image Homoshrexual posted on CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM's wall (The latter @ ing everyone to it) may have been 'p. Whoops!

To which Seafarer replied by calling dramatards attention-whore r-slurs and comparing them with soyteens:

Why is the Farms the only E-gossip site with a user base that isn't filled with the most braindead r-slurs on the planet? Everything on websites like /r/drama and soyjak.party feels very attention whorey, like everyone is always in a competition to shock or gross other users out.

Discuss:

!chuds

nothing more aggravating after being on hold for 10 minutes than hearing an Indian accent proof crapitalism has failed

The interiors were taken ten years ago, the exteriors this past week.

I have a lot of similar shots and need to figure out which ones to use. Usually I'd just let the client determine that, but I'm the client now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Francis_de_Sales_Church_(Norton_Shores,_Michigan)

You think King knew it was fake from the start?

I'd like readers to consider the evidence in “Veritas” and decide for themselves.

She didn't present photographs when she first announced the papyrus to her colleagues. That immediately raised alarms, that she didn't give her own colleagues the evidence needed to evaluate the papyrus. And she didn't release images of the other key piece in Fritz's collection, a fragment supposedly from the Gospel of John, which top scholars of Coptic had marked as a forgery within hours of seeing it.

Why withhold evidence from colleagues if you believe it's authentic? Did she know it was fake and thought the ends justify the means? Was she willing to use a fake sensation to whet the public's appetite for this other interesting object (the Gnostic gospels)? To use a forgery to point to the truth?

https://nebula.wsimg.com/f7bf9174e94fcd10bcb290443e55c03f?AccessKeyId=7FECC3FA0F0362C6C7C2&disposition=0&alloworigin=1

^ Covers the evidence and timeline that this was lying

Reminder that these are the people teaching religion at universities. Hacks and antichrists, the lot of them.

!christians !catholics

!thin !vegana

"SONIC'S ARMS ARE NOT FRICKING BLUE!!"

Sorry I only had one effortpost in me today, just click through. Remember that 95% of people will never know a few morons jerking each other off determine what the internet thinks is true