This is the Edgar (with a hard R). Mexican TikTok addicts love it and pretty much every criminal in San Antonio California does too (because they're all 14 year old mexicans). Antoniocels have started to notice this, and make comments on it in every post, so naturally, jannies have decided that dropping the hard R is racist and remove every comment using this disgusting slur. Por ejemplo:

HE DOESN'T EVEN GO HERE

https://old.reddit.com/r/sanantonio/comments/1ci1lwa/teen_killed_at_market_square_fiesta_event_was_out/?sort=controversial

More removed comments:

https://old.reddit.com/r/sanantonio/comments/1ci4q41/private_sale_gone_wrong/?sort=controversial

And now Antoniocels have started rioting:

https://old.reddit.com/r/sanantonio/comments/1cil980/the_mods_removed_my_crosspost_for_a_bogus_reason/?sort=controversial

They're calling jannies gringo pandejos too:

And it's completely true, they are a bunch of gringos:

They've decided that it's time for jannycide:

https://old.reddit.com/r/sanantonio/comments/1cihhff/with_all_the_infighting_between_mods_and_folks_we/?sort=controversial

#1 This comment from menslib mod VladWard explains that masculinity is totally unrelated to the male experience and identity to the wtf of menslibbers

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/?sort=controversial

Masculinity is totally unrelated to the male experience or identity. It is a set of externally-defined traits and behaviors which are rewarded when performed by men and punished when performed by women. Universal values are fundamentally incompatible with masculinity because universal values are not punished when performed by women. "Redefining masculinity" only changes the values that are rewarded/punished based on gender, not the fundamental dynamic of rewarding one but punishing another for the same behavior.

lmao

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l1xrn5p/?context=8&sort=controversial

I don't think I agree with this definition of masculinity at all.

Why? Because you say so? Because Patriarchy has instilled within you the value statement "Masculinity is good" and you're willing to do whatever mental gymnastics are necessary to hold onto this?

This is how masculinity works, dude. This is exactly why you hear feminist women talking about Womanhood and Sisterhood but almost never about "femininity".

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l1xtoa1/?context=8&sort=controversial

I don't agree with it because, as I pointed out and you ignored while belittling my standpoint, it's an incredibly simple definition to falsify.

Being muscular and strong is masculine.

A woman doing masculine things will be punished.

Here's a woman who's wildly successful specifically because she's muscular and strong.

Wait a minute, what does that do to 1 and 2?

Are you really about to run over to TwoX and tell the broad audience of women that being "muscular and strong" (which I'm sure is no way being coded differently for men and women) is socially rewarded and they should all be cheering for the downfall of Patriarchy and beauty standards?

C'mon, man. Yes, I'm being dismissive of you. This is a pro-feminist sub, which means - among other very important things - that we use feminist philosophical and conceptual frameworks as a foundation for our discussions here.

You are choosing to completely ignore those and run with whatever combination of words has the right vibe.

this reply from that jannie REALLY pissed menslibbers off

#2 menslibber has a moment of clarity

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l1wwd7x/?context=8&sort=controversial

Young men are looking for a guide on how to be men. The hard right is eagerly handing them a set of step by step instructions, and we're standing around debating whether a gendered role is something we should accept the existence of.

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/_/l1x9sbe/#comment-info

this was removed by jannies

This. Like it or not, many young men want to or feel like they have to be "manly". Whatever that means. They will look for instructions on how to achieve that, and somebody will provide.

In fact, this is a general problem in "progressive" circles, contemplating how, in a better world X would not be a problem to begin with. Okay, but X is a problem and we have to address it, or somebody else will.

What do we do, though? How do we define "manly" in a way that doesn't constrain or exclude women from normal human virtues/activities?

Masculine and feminine are not inherently opposites or mutually exclusive, no matter what some people might think.

Imagine I am trying to write a good action movie. There are a lot of dipshits out there who think that action movies and, say, romance movies, are fundamentally opposites. They are wrong. And it becomes obvious once you start trying to give someone advice on how to write an action movie.

If someone says "a good action movie has relatable characters", the person saying "oh, so romance movies can't have relatable characters?" Is just as off base as the person saying "right! Action movies have amazing awesome relatable characters, not like stupid romance movies, that absolutely can't."

reasonable comment gets jannied amazing

#3 Foid provides menslibbers with platitudes as the benefits of feminism to their disbelief

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l1xjtcf/?context=8&sort=controversial

but surely there are options that don't require such a wholesale change to our society as a whole?

No, there aren't. The successes that feminism had required many wholesale changes to society, and they're far from done. Freeing men as well will require still more.

I'm not willing to accept that the only thing we can offer young men is the vague promise that things will be better in the post-gender-role, post-success-focused future that probably won't ever happen. Not least because doing so makes fascism more attractive, and therefore more likely.

They want to know how to be better at being men. Telling them to let go of the idea of being a man will only work for a small number of them.

What? Not teaching them they need to be a specific kind of man is a specific and necessary step, though far from the only one, and what you're saying about a "post-gender future" and fascism has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.

So what are you talking about? If I'm fifteen years old and I want to know how to feel more comfortable in my own skin, what are you offering to me?

Well, if I was in a position to be some kind of mentor figure to this hypothetical fifteen year old, I'd start by listening to what they feel uncomfortable with and ask questions to try to figure out the root causes. But that's putting the cart before the horse; one person talking to one kid is not how these problems get solved at a systemic level.

So what does "the left" have to offer the general mass of teenage boys looking for guidance?

Empathy, publicly funded healthcare and education, universal basic income

#4 menslibber explains how a boy becomes a man using feminist theory flummoxing the menslibber

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l1x97cd/?context=8&sort=controversial

Well that's the whole point why we're teaching young boys to only look up to men which opens them up to being lead by ppl like tate brothers etc, we need to raise this point again and again that good ethics matter more than roleplaying ur gender. B/w gender and morals, morals shld come first. And young men shldnt be afraid to idolise or emmulate non-men either

This is exactly the problem. Teenage boys want to know how to become men, and a non-trivial chunk of the left responds with "well, you shouldn't just be looking at men as examples." Meanwhile, the fascists are saying "hit the gym, study STEM, and don't bother listening to the idiots on the left who don't even know what a man should be."

This is exactly why young men are becoming fascists. They're asking a question, and the fascists are giving a clear and actionable set of recommendations. Meanwhile we're arguing over whether we should answer the question at all or instead just tell them to ask a different question.

You literally become a man just by being a boy who reaches adulthood. Most of the huge problem here is how much meaning men apply to "manhood" and how small they make the box.

There's a reason feminism taught girls that all women are women, no set of "virtues" or "behaviors" necessary.

#5 Menslibber explains that a lot of woman are choosing to be single because of... toxic masculinity. And that woman are fawning over non-traditionally masculine looking men like... Timothée Chalamet. To the utter confusion of Takeittocirclejerk

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l1zafhm/?context=8&sort=controversial

My issue is that I see women, by and large, still want a man. Not just a person. A man.

I think that's just widely false. Many women are actually choosing to be single because of toxic masculinity. Women widely are fawning over non-traditional looking men like Timothée Chalamet. There are certainly some women that want a man™, but I would argue those women have their own gender expectations to work through, and finding someone that doesn't expect you to uphold traditional gender roles to an extreme will result in more happiness for both people.

gently: can we not use hot, rich, fit, superstar actors as our example here?

I think that you describing him as "hot" actually reinforces the example, in a way. Timothee Chalamet is decidedly not traditionally masculine, but he's widely regarded as an attractive man. When I was young (which was a very long time ago), he would not have been regarded so.

this is not a traditionally masculine looking moid you fricking chud

#6 the comments in this post were so r-slurred that a menslibber commented that they were leaving the sub and it WASN'T JANNIED

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l21qj4o/?context=8&sort=controversial

This is it, this is the post that convinces me to leave this sub before it actually ends up pushing me to the right. I genuinely cannot read the headline or the article in any way except "Can we please just get men to face the truth that male gender issues don't exist and only fighting misogyny matters?"

Yeah, it's really annoying. Like all you literally have to do is acknowledge issues that boys/men face and that would take away most of what hooks men/boys to toxic content. You don't even have to solve the issues to make a huge difference. Just acknowledge they exist.... If every news station tomorrow (for a single day) talked about all the issues men/boys face it would drive so many young men to more healthy ways of coping. We keep giving these toxic outlets to men and then blaming the toxic outlets.

#7 menslibber asks what progressives acknowledge is a mens issue without the need to self flagellate, resulting in

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/1cgnrxq/opinion_the_atmosphere_of_the_manosphere_is_toxic/l21r43s/?context=8&sort=controversial

"The solutions being offered by progressive folks?"

Name a male gender issue that progressives are willing to so much as acknowledge without sticking a "but it's actually a form of misogyny at its core" caveat on it, let alone offer a solution to. I'll wait.

!neolibs !anticommunists

https://old.reddit.com/r/greentext/comments/1cie0py/i_dont_like_these_odds/?sort=controversial

bonus turbo reddit soy reply

showed that racist

https://9gag.com/gag/a4P4dOp#comment

The only thing gayer than a 9gag PRO user, is a 9gag PRO+ user!

It's nice cuz the PRO users are in on the joke

And dab on the poorcels

RANDOM RACISM that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of the post coming through choo choo

It's over for 9strags

Back to PRO+

Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

Sorry -sincerely. I've just been hearing "republicans bad" for the last 8... 10 years now and it brings me great satisfaction to throw it back in the lefts face. Don't take it personally - it's just the internet. (18)

Maybe that should give you pause. You now have power culturally, because you're defending Israel. Now why is that? (-16)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

I couldn't agree with this more. The protests are so ungodly cringe worthy and I can't even begin to explain how uneducated it makes everyone participating look. (14)

It's cringworthy to protest children being bombed? (-15)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘

It's cringe worthy protesting something happening on the other side of the planet and disrupting your peers while not even having a basic understanding of the history of the conflict or your countries relations with anyone involved, while providing no alternative solution. Where were the protestors when the US military dropped 25,000 bombs in Syria and Iraq during the Obama administration? Do you think those all missed civilians?The only reason people are protesting this is because they've been abducted by an obvious propaganda campaign and to feel self righteous as if they are making any difference what so ever. (15)

They want the university to cut ties completely with isreal and companies that are arming isreal. So it is fairly close to home. https://m.startribune.com/hundreds-of-minneapolis-war-protesters-condemn-u-s-action-in-syria/222829311/People protested the bombing of syria. So, not realizing that means you have the memory of a goldfish. (-10)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Is there a difference between anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist in your opinion? Is there room in the protest for people to be against the killing of Palestinian civilians but not for extermination of Jews? It's a complicated topic that is being overly generalized. I am also for peaceful protests and no destruction of property! Wish there were easily visible good verses bad here. (20)

I'm quite certain there's intellectual nuance here with anti-Jew vs. anti-Zionist, but it's not showing up in practice. I wish it would. I also wouldn't confuse "complicated" with "destructive". It's not complicated in my mind. Israel must prosecute its war in a manner incongruent with past strategies (which clearly have not worked). It needs to be destructive to do this, which is a hellish tragedy. Innocent people will die in war and that is unjust. But that alone does not make the totality of the war unjust. There is an incomparable divide between how the IDF prosecutes its wars vs. the aggressors in this case (using terror, kidnapping, torture, etc. as political tools). I admire your instinct for more neutrality here, more "middle-ground". Unfortunately, there's really not much middle-ground left. Israel's enemies (for the most part, not all) are seeking elimination in total. That's an "extinction-level" event and I don't fault Israel for responding accordingly. (2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

It's cringe worthy protesting something happening on the other side of the planet and disrupting your peers while not even having a basic understanding of the history of the conflict or your countries relations with anyone involved, while providing no alternative solution. Where were the protestors when the US military dropped 25,000 bombs in Syria and Iraq during the Obama administration? Do you think those all missed civilians?The only reason people are protesting this is because they've been abducted by an obvious propaganda campaign and to feel self righteous as if they are making any difference what so ever. (15)

lol where were they, idk probably being children as they are college kids now and the war in the middle east started in the early 2000's. is that really your argument on them being uneducated. just you say they are so they are. and where we're the 20 year olds 15 years ago to protest the Iraq War lol. what a weak argument. the "only" reason anyone would protest murdering 15 k children is to feel self-righteous. that doesn't even make sense. the 15k dead kids isn't a reason enough in your mind see, so it's hard for you to understand when others actually care about something like that, and the history between Israel and palistine is irrelevant. what israel is doing is evil and anti human being. literally nothing in history will justify that. hamas is evil too and israel is trying to show the world they are worse. why. what 200 hamas guys got thru and commited this terrorist attack? why not send troops to arrest and hold those who did this accountable. why would the choice be to bomb 1... (-2)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

My argument on them being "uneducated" is that they fail to understand the relations between countries involved in the conflict and the US. The US and Israel have been close allies in matters of security and military since the 80s. The US has supported Israel since the 60s and Israel plays a key role in promoting good relations with neighboring countries while holding off hostility from Syria and Iran. Iran is a sworn enemy to the United States AND Israel. They fail to understand the Iran-Israel Proxy Conflict that has been ongoing since February 1985. Who is the #1 external supporter of HAMAS that funds AND arms them? IRAN. Not only is Israel an incredibly important US ally for security, military, AND technological manufacturing. They are a key nation to stability in the Middle East. Without Israel comes increased instability, which results in many more atrocities and genocide. Propaganda has literally convinced easily manipulated progressives to stand with a terrorist organization... (3)

all that you said is iran bad israel good. objectively united states has killed more innocent people than Iran. none of what you say matters at all. none of it. people are protesting because of the evil actions israel is taking. you can parrot the us gov position on israel all you want. they are our great ally. without them something very very spooky will happen. more genocide and death. let's completely ignore the death and genocide israel commits. they only do it to stop more death and genocide. iran is gunna nuke the world without israel murdering 15 k kids, even tho they are at most want to be a regional power and not a world superpower. none of that matters. People are protesting one of the most powerful militaries on earth, indiscriminate destruction of life and property in gaza. simple as that. the history us irrelevant. and im sure the history isn't as one sided as you would like me to think. I'm absolutly positive the isralis have done horrible shit in the past as they are ... (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/The_way_out_24

Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+2🐮)

Number of comments: 12

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

!marseyartists

Maybe I'll try to make an animated one another time

Previously, I had declared my feelings of affection to a female friend of mine (let's just call her Sarah because her name is Sarah). The feelings were not reciprocated, but she let me down in a weird way, she spoke about how she doesn't know how she feels, but she's not looking for a relationship at the moment. She embraces the asexuality meme which is partially how we ended up being friends.

More recently, I decided to give it another shot but to be more tactful this time. I told her I don't think I'm asexual anymore, and that I want to be in a relationship. Once again, she reiterated that she doesn't know how she feels and that a relationship isn't what she wants. Nevertheless, as always, she was nice about it and continues to actively pursue my friendship and constantly tells me she loves me.

At first, this confused me. However, I think I have some of it figured out. I have learned a bit about women and human relationships in general from this experience, and I'd like to share some of the reasons why it's almost certainly a bad idea to pursue your female friends. Now, of course there will be exceptions. Sometimes your female friend genuinely does like you and you'll have a romcom moment. My point is that that's probably not the case, and while you may view the friendship with rose-tinted glasses, she sees things totally differently.

1. They're used to it

Since they started developing breasts, women have been the center of sexual attention. It comes from all angles including older men, teachers, family members, and even other women. At some point, they get used to it and it becomes background noise. "Yes, he's ogling my breasts but I need to finish scanning my groceries".

The sexual attention also comes from male friends. You're NOT the first male friend to express romantic emotions, and you won't be the last. She's turned all of them down, what makes you think things will be different with you? She's used to it, she probably saw it coming, and she doesn't want it. If she did, you wouldn't have to ask because she'd make it obvious to you that she's romantically interested.

Now, there is the possibility of misreading signals, which brings us to the next point.

2. Women genuinely have platonic feelings

This is not to say that men are incapable of having platonic relationships. Nay, that is not my point. My argument is that it is much harder for men to do so. People shit on Steve Harvey but he was 100% correct when he said the following:

Things aren't the same with women. They can genuinely love you deeply without any sexual or romantic feelings. Why is this? Women don't have to deal with the famine mentality. For many men, s*x and love are scarce resources, so when it even vaguely seems like there's an opportunity for it, the feelings come on strong. Hence the cliche of "the cashier smiled at me now I want to marry her". (Most) women aren't leading you on intentionally when they allow intimacy into a friendship. That's the way friendships should be. But it doesn't mean she wants anything sexual or romantic.

3. You're in love because you're lonely

This is probably the crux of the issue. When you're starving, even a mud pie looks delicious. As men, you will face long stretches of loneliness and never being told you're beautiful, attractive, or worthy of anything. Inasmuch as catcalling and sexual objectification should be chastised, it at least serves as some kind of validation of one's attractiveness.

A friendship with a woman can bring about those feelings of validation within men and if you're not ready for it, it's going to develop into obsessive love. If you had higher self-esteem, more experience with women, or a source of love, your friendships with women would be completely normal and platonic. It's when these elements are missing that any smile, hug, or eye-gaze turns into fantasies of marriage.

When she inevitably turns you down, what are you left with? Nothing yet again. Nobody to say they love you or assure you that you are wanted in this world.

Things get more complicated if you're an introvert. Most relationships seem useless unless you're benefitting considerably. In your mind the thinking is "I'd only put this much effort into a relationship if I had romantic feelings". Whereas if the woman is an extrovert, it isn't costing her much mental energy to maintain the relationship. I hope that make sense.

4. She knows already

Don't bother. She already knows you like her. She accepts that as part of the cost of the friendship. That's not a bad thing. It means there's something good about you that she wants in her life even if its not of the romantic nature. You should be flattered by this even if it is heartbreaking at times.

Some women are a bit mean with this. They essentially get everything they would get from a boyfriend (someone to talk to, someone to take care of them) without the need to commit. But that's not always the case. In my case, Sarah goes out her way to be nice to me and to spend time with me. She's not using me for anything - a genuine, platonic friendship is all she wants. It's hard for my brain to wrap my head around it. I thought it was obvious that she felt something. Maybe I had to take the lead and break the ice? Nah, I'm convinced she knew ages ago I liked her but loved me enough to still be my friend despite not sharing romantic feelings.

5. You may lose everything

Life is about taking risks so I don't want to stress this point too much. However, if she doesn't already know and you spring it up on her, she may never trust you again and you will lose all the intimacy of your friendship. She will remain guarded around you, and perhaps even think of you as a slimy coomer who tried to use friendship to get into her pants. Shit can get brutal.

I've been lucky to have an understanding friends who has continued to be nice to me. I know that this isn't the case for everyone, and it also depends on how you respond to the rejection.

CONCLUSION

Heartbreak is one of the worst feelings to experience. It's like a knife constantly twisting in your chest. But it's part of life for most of us. A lucky few will find high-school sweethearts and never have to play the dating game, but for most of us, we're going to get rekt a couple times before we find the right one (if we ever do). Please, for the love of god, don't go looking for a girlfriend from your female friends. There's a difference between a girl friend and a girlfriend.

I'm probably preaching to the choir, and this may be obvious to most people here. But I know there are some autists who may need to read this to spare themselves the heartache I went through. The funny part is that if you're in love, nothing I write is going to change anything. You'll think your case is different. You'll try your luck. And you'll get rekt. But don't let me stop you. Some mistakes are meant to be made.

I know the asexuality meme isn't true. One day, she'll find a guy she likes (not me) and all that asexuality shit will disappear. And when it happens it will hurt like heck. However, I'm prepared, and I'll still be her friend. I'm wiser now thanks to the mistakes I've made. Thanks for reading.

In six short days, this tale of moidal dysfunction has gone from /r/NotHowGirlsWork to Xhitter, to the NYPost (the house media organ of the angry Xiterverse) and now back to /r/2XC.

What's the verdict, dramautists?

- 25 votes

The claims⁠, which were mainly shared on X (formerly Twitter) but also popped up across Reddit and Facebook, range from Vanguard preventing startup programs from firing correctly to other programs crashing when the anti-cheat software loads, and some have even suggested Riot's kernel program has been “tampering with unrelated files.” Others simply dubbed it “malware” and declared they would be quitting League until the program stopped breaking PCs.

One high-profile example came from famed League creator LS, who reported both his computers breaking after Vanguard was installed on May 1. He said he fixed one by taking out the CMOS battery and forcing BIOS access, but suggested his other computer is “still bricked.”

:

Several user posts on the purported Vanguard issues have also been shared to the main League subreddit but they have since been deleted.

While Riot has yet to address any of the early backlash directly, tech staff have been active in the “Patch 14.9 Bug Megathread” on /r/LeagueOfLegends. One Riot reply suggested some of today's alleged issues “wouldn't be related to Vanguard” and offered up a simpler solution⁠—restart impacted devices and run PC troubleshooting.

The same Riot staffer also suggested any aggrieved players could upload Riot Vanguard logs to the League support page to help “isolate what the issue is.” All the Reddit comments from that Rioter have since been removed.

https://twitter.com/aniwilc/status/1786075565419630899

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/normal-kids-get-fricked-columbia-cornell-protests-fraternities

https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-suspended-us-green-card-applications-foreign-workers-2024-4

https://twitter.com/Carnage4Life/status/1786007150562828542

Tldr

It used to be as a foreign worker you'd get sponsored for a green card after working at a big tech for a few years.

But due to layoffs companies have to first make a case for why they laid off an American to then sponsor a foreigner. Google, now Amazon and others have stopped it

Me, making a dentist appt: “First, my insurance has changed from last time: I’m now on _____; do you take that?”
Her: “We take some of their plans, yes.”
Me: “Okay…uhh…so can you look mine up and see if you take that one?”
Her: “No, I can’t.”
Me: …

— Jessie (@jessiejensen) May 1, 2024

This fricking receptionist jumps in and is all "it's actually your responsibility.." and replies to every c*nt telling her to shut it

https://twitter.com/Madixoxolynn/status/1785747318572265675

How come she can do it?

https://twitter.com/Shenanigans_luv/status/1786028076322988139

"Congrats on your luck 😀❤️"

https://twitter.com/Madixoxolynn/status/1785828131678593327

https://twitter.com/typoaspraxis/status/1786072062647300232

Some interesting livejournal entries about India and Haiti from Scott Alexander back when people could describe third world countries without every other comment demanding that you check your privilege

trip to India

trip to Haiti

trip to Haiti continued with photos

My wife is a product manager a FAANG company. Today she observed a trans-woman coworker taking milk out of the mothers' room (where working moms who are breast feeding their babies go to pump milk).

There is a fridge in this room, and my wife saw the trans woman enter the room then leave with 2 or 3 bags of milk shortly thereafter.

Should my wife report this to HR? Is this normal? My wife is an ally but this concerned her.

it's like they're playing a game of "how obvious can i make the bait" lmao

UPDATE:

My wife did some digging, and spoke with another woman in the office who is breastfeeding, and this other woman did notice some of her milk missing at the end of the day. She thought it was just someone else taking it by mistake, even though the bags are labeled, but once my wife explained that she saw this trans woman leaving the mother's room with milk, it all made sense.

My wife and this woman confronted the trans woman about the milk, and the trans woman denied taking anything.

The next day, HR wants to talk to my wife and this other breastfeeding woman, they are being accused of transphobia and making the trans woman feel unsafe. My wife did explain her side of the story.

The company is now doing an investigation.

My wife is really stressed out because of it.

Before:

After:

No more quick trollaway accounts now that signing up requires an email address:

https://www.engadget.com/fcc-votes-to-restore-net-neutrality-protections-161350168.html

Here's some dude saying that's horrible

https://twitter.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status/1783559014950854704

https://store.steampowered.com/app/2803310/The_Detractor/

!ranchers !g*mers !r-slurs

36 yr old white man tasered after murdering 14 year old boy in England. Very lucky he was white.

A black man or Muslim would have been shot dead! pic.twitter.com/5z8DAhlKHb

— T. Bernadetti (@MrsRoyKeaneo) May 1, 2024

Another sad victim of America brain disease

!britbongs

Turns out he was a !macacos so everyone now gets to claim he was their preferred racial group

https://twitter.com/ryan1mcq3/status/1785640624722514328

https://twitter.com/MarkMcC57046578/status/1785734668882506171

https://twitter.com/ParkBoundary/status/1785946683630620846

https://twitter.com/MarkMcC57046578/status/1785734436060840054

It's extra stupid because the Met infamously did shoot a Brazilian in 2005 and he was innocent

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Jean_Charles_de_Menezes

This is Judge Andrea Jarmon in Seattle.

She just dismissed ALL criminal trespass charges against half of the pro-Palestine activists who blocked the I-5 for 4 hours.

Jarmon sided with the defense attorneys, suggesting it was wrong of state patrol to recognize the suspects from… pic.twitter.com/ozfOmdANom

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) May 2, 2024

What happens next when burgers don't take the judiciary seriously at all anymore?

Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. We (PCC) got completely pushed out. Cops are ripping encampment to shreds and engaging in psychological warfare. Arrests happening.

This fight isn’t over. UCLA made a huge mistake. ALL POWER TO THE STUDENTS!

— People's City Council - Los Angeles (@PplsCityCouncil) May 2, 2024

Nooooo the Christians are sending the Jews against the Arabs! There would be peace in the middle east if White Identity Extremists weren't arming that famously poor demographic, Israeli Jews, against their will!

Yes I have a very nuanced view of world politics from behind my screen in my parent's sunroom.

Got to give him credit for finding an angle that allows him to blame red-hat Nazis on Reddit for war in the middle east.

Giant fricking mong.

Surely this isn’t legal.

Valorant now takes screenshots of your pc, They are actually able to screenshot discord chats and fullscreen any window without you knowing and uploading it to their servers. @ItsGamerDoc ? pic.twitter.com/UplsvMLgdW

— wait (@w_sted) May 1, 2024

Surely this isn't legal.

Valorant now takes screenshots of your pc, They are actually able to screenshot groomercord chats and fullscreen any window without you knowing and uploading it to their servers.

>Decide to play valorant

>All of China gets to know your groomercord chats, bank activity, goon websites and every other degenerate activity you're up to in 2-6 minute intervals of playing the game

Relevant Unknowncheats thread with more technical explanations:

https://www.unknowncheats.me/forum/anti-cheat-bypass/634974-vanguard-taking-screenshot-pc.html