None

The last few days on Twitter people have been mocking women who think that they'd be safer lost in the woods next to a bear than a random man.

Of course women will jump into these conversations and say "but men bad" and get flamed, then cry about how mean the internet is to the mentally handicapped.

Today, I saw this one, who seemingly proudly announces that she purposefully buzzkills parties.

None
Reported by:
27
MAY BOOKCLUB VOTING :marseyreading:

good afternoon, !bookworms :star:

we have below our bookclub nominations for the month of may! :marseyclappingglasses: i included some of my own. :marseybutt: today (may 1) will be the only voting round so make it count please! tomorrow (may 2) we begin!! :marseyangel:

you may vote for more than one book. book winner will be announced alongside a chapter breakdown either tn or tmw morning. have fun! :marseyplaying:

vote below.

have a great day! <3

None
4
new toss
None

:marseybear:https://media.giphy.com/media/qjtqEScZudXnnbnbz4/giphy.webp

None

My manager makes us โ€œweigh inโ€ before starting a shift and then again before a shift meal

I don't really know what to make of this. We've been under a lot of pressure to portion control. My manager is always freaking out when we are low on anything at all and says we aren't hitting our โ€œnumbersโ€.

I swear he's getting paranoid due to the pressure from corporate. There's a lot of concern about employees eating on the job and โ€œskimping off the binsโ€. He decided to remedy this with a scale. I shit you not.

Before every shift we have to weigh in. Before we have our shift meal he makes us weigh in again. He says if we've gained weight we don't get to have a shift meal because obviously we are skimping? Apparently water doesn't weigh anything.

This feels illegal but he says it's not because it's to prevent theft and that he keeps the numbers private. Has this been implemented at other chipotles? Please help.

None
None
None
None
5
:marseydiversity:

!bharatiya Mauritius has a legit party called militant socialist movement and a separate party called the mauritian militant movement :marseyxd: Our blood brothers truly :marseyembrace:

:marseyarabcelebration:

None

Most Based Comments

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Y'all really missed the point of warhammer huh? (-34)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Is it though..? Is it really..? Raise your hand if that has literally happened to you while playing. (-28)

Basedness: ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

[ Removed by Reddit ] (-23)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

[removed] (1)

Is this... The fabled second account? It couldn't be... But it speaks exactly like the other one. And acts like it too? Did you forget to switch back? Careless.To be clear, you never argued outside of pooping on me. And even when you were, that was on another comment, another discussion, and you barely managed to articulate the point. You didn't even win there, we ended up agreeing. Our argument here, was that you were not ok. Which is obviously true at this point. You fit right in with those so-called illiterate bastards, but I haven't found a lot here on this sub.You don't seem to understand the concept any better than your theoretical inferiors. In fact, I'd rate you inferior to even the dumbest person on this sub. I'd rate you at a 94 out of 200. And this is the most coherent you've been all night. "Getting on your level" would necessitate a huge step down, I might even need to become a 4channer on /pol/ or an actual fascist to become as stupid as you. In fact, from here on, I'... (2)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Asmongold fan with a dogshit take still ultimately missing the point of this corpse of a sub is hilarious. Bite the curb lol.There is no โ€œdisagreeingโ€ you either read the material, or you don't. The lonely cornballs here can't do that, and are therefore inferiors. Don't make a bad faith sub to cry and shit your pants while I run circles around you if the best argument you've got is โ€œSTOP LORDING INFO OVER MEEEโ€ (0)

I lost my previous draft, windows update, so this will be a lot shorter. Ad hominem, again. I'm not sure where the Asmongold comment came from, projection? Or are you simply looking for a crack to hammer into, as you fundamentally have no argument.How many ribs did you need to remove to suck your own peepee that hard. I'm not even surprised, of course an egotistical piece of shit like you would refer to people who disagree with you as inferiors. Winning an argument(By that I mean insulting people and laughing at them, because I doubt you've ever actually won an argument) on the internet definitely makes you an intelligent person who hasn't wasted three hours of their time. And I say that, aware this is very stupid. But as to calling other people inferiors? We've found the rot I think. That sounds a lot like Gobineau's ideology justifying racism, I bet it's for similar reason's too. I can't help but wonder just when you became garbage. And at this point I'd be surprised if you had ever... (4)

Angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

That's something I've done for a very long time, 10-15 years. It's simply habit at this point. And if it falls off, sad, but your point will be proven. (4)

Oh there's no โ€œifโ€ the lonely blancos association has already died. The melting pot of colossal losers who don't understand the material much less read it will remain here and cry for however many years until they bite the curb. Warhammer moved on from primaris and WHFB being detonated, things that actually merit giving a shit about. A bunch of lonely losers being lore (and business illiterate) was already a corpse walking. (1)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/Hidden_Variable1993

Score: ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Number of comments: 10

Average angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

Maximum angriness: ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ˜ก

Minimum angriness: ๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜๐Ÿ”˜

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining! :marseyminer:

:marppy: autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. :marseycapitalistmanlet: Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion :marseyjamming:

None
None
42
Men can't grasp the idea that women can be happy single : TwoXChromosomes

Whenever a woman posts about being happy single and childless at 30+ y/o men are always in the comments saying something along the lines of โ€œthis is cope, if you were truly happy you wouldn't be posting about itโ€.

:marseyhesright:

And thing is a woman can't be happy single and childless together because women are social creatures and will get a huge depression if they have nobody near them and western women are home enough that they also often have distant relationship with parents and family

I guess by that logic women who post about their happy marriages are also secretly miserable and โ€œcopingโ€.

That's also often true but women love to brag and dunk on another women so if it was man who wrote how happy married he is than that would been suspicious

Also, thinking that women are โ€œexpiredโ€ at 30 is so delusional. You can definitely get married in your 30s and even 40s. Men who watch that redpill bullshit have really lost the sense of real world.

>You can definitely get married in your 30s and even 40s

She subconsciously shows she knows it becomes pain in butt to get married to a good man that โ€œand evenโ€ is cherry on top :marseypipe:

I mean of course all women in the west can marry someone living in third world and bring them to the west it's not hard and possible at any age but that ain't happening because western equality loving women don't want to betabuxx a man. And in the west at 30+ there more straight women than men and successful men that those foids want don't care about their roasties asses.

After checking her profile

https://old.reddit.com/r/s*x/comments/1ccx4uc/having_sex_on_antidepressants_as_a_woman/

Her post about women being happy single would had more weight behind if she didn't had s*x after using antidepressants 6 days ago so she probably recently broken up :marseythumbsup:

She is having dreams about having bi son

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17145871201608596.webp

Also she is pooping on Trump while she is apparently Russian living in Russia :marseythumbsup:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1bddytk/how_is_trump_eligible_to_run_for_president/?sort=controversial

She also must be 24 or younger

So literally an r-slur

None
Reported by:
  • BananaSundae : Wait, I thought this was a drama site. Why are there a bunch of cute twinks serious posting itt?
108
Do you notice something wrong with boys? : Teachers | Old maids mald over based boys

For many, many years, I've recorded that my girls outperform the boys by a wide margin. In my case, the measured difference between them is so large that I cannot help but think something is wrong with our boys, particularly after I also account for their general behavior.

If I test 100 children and score work blindly, with names removed, the top 90% will be girls, and it has been so for a couple decades.

Sounds like you teach grade school.

Boys largely struggle to follow simple directions. Working memory is poor. Executive functioning is minimal. They are impulsive to the core, constantly distracted, and unable to perform at grade level. Compared to girls, the boys leave me feeling as if I where working with infants and toddlers. Most students we have in our special education programs and those with IEPs are boys. In every class I've had, most of the boys strike me as being mentally handicapped. Yes, there are outliers. There are always outliers amongst both genders.

lmao :ethot: These literal children would rather play than listen to me, are they retarded?

I don't know if boys ever catch up,

Considering !fellas outperform !biofoids almost across the board I'd say they do more than catch up

but I do not suspect that to be the case, given the deltas I record every day. I'm familiar with the old anecdotes of boys maturing slower and being a couple years behind the emotional development of girls, but this appears to be something more ominous.

No, boys are just tuff enough that they don't falter the moment you crack the whip.

its called the patriarchy. Boys are not held to the same social standards as girls.

Then why are boys the most likely to be punished?

The patriarchy, which leaves boys behind?

The sentiment is that low achieving boys will achieve higher than high achieving women because of patriarchal standards.

These boys DON'T have to try hard because the system is meant for them to succeed.

Are you literally retarded? They don't try because they don't care. They're children who'd rather be playing amongst themselves.

Except that's not an explanation for what's happening here. Boys aren't doing worse in high school because they "have an understanding" that they will succeed later on. They're just...failing.

They aren't just failing in K-12, either. The success of boys in a continual downtrend at college as well.

It's bizarre to me that someone would look at a kid who is going to drop out of high school and say "Well, the patriarchy!" like it's a point worth making in that context.

It's because teachers are made up solely of unicels who had it pounded into their head that patriarchy was the great satan that caused all sin in the world.

Teachers are mostly women. Parents who actually parent are mostly women. Males are taught to not respect or listen to women. It's not difficult stuff to grasp.

That doesn't track at all. Somehow the majority of authority in a boys life is female and he's taught not to respect them? No, hr learns not to respect them. Seeing teachers fail basic physical tasks, bow down to empty authority and go on childish power trips teaches him not to respect women.

None
22
Foundational Texts cont'd
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.